Commenting on the final, canonical form of each New Testament book Showing how the text shapes theological convictions and moral habits Attending to the ancient narrative and rhetorical strategies the text employs Key distinctives of this commentary series are: Each author pays attention to the cultural, literary, and theological setting of the text form. The audience of this commentary set is for MA religious and theological students who have a theological interests in the text. (Info taken from the "Features of the New Interpreter's Bible")Ī partial New Testament commentary series: No knowledge of biblical languages needed for this series. The breadth of theological commitments will aid the interpreter desiring to see the breadth of interpretive problems and theological selections of various passages and books. Theological interpretive and critical decisions range from moderately conservative to moderately critical to Lutheranism to New Perspective. Brief introductions that provide rudimentary details on essential historical, sociocultural, literary, and theological issues.Įach volume is dependent upon the skill and theological positions of each author. Expositional analysis informed by linguistic, text-critical, historical-critical, literary, social-scientific, and theological methods. Introduction to Apocalyptic Literature, Introduction to Epistolary Literature, Introduction to Narrative Literature, etc.) Various "Introductions" for interpreting genre literature (e.g. Key features of this commentary series are: who desires a commentary series with broad denominational, creedal, and theological positions. This series is written for the teacher, preacher, student, etc. (Info taken from the Series Preface" and interaction with the commentary)Ī full testament commentary, including the Pseudepigraphal writings. The value of this series is the broad range of authors under the assumptions of the Nicene Creed, thereby broadening the interpretive positions. Therefore, the value of each volume is based upon the abilities and theological interoperation of each author.Įach volume lacks a hermeneutical, methodological, and theological continuity and all affirm the the fluidity of theological interpretation (which may be flawed). Doctrinal and methodological ecumenism.Įach author is chosen, not on the basis of historical or philological expertise, but for their abilities in the Christian doctrinal tradition. Theologians reading and interpreting the Scriptures creedally. Theological interpretation of the Scriptures. Purposed lack of historical, linguistic, and technical discussions of the text. Their theological ecumenism stems from the editors that the early church fathers were correct in that "church doctrine does not compete with Scripture in a limited economy of epistemic authority" (13). Therefore, this seeks to advance the Nicene tradition, with all its diversities and controversies, to provide an interpretation of the Bible as Christian Scripture. Their basic premise stems from a presupposition that dogma clarifies as opposed to obscures. ![]() This is a partial Old and New Testament Commentary set.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |